A specialist lawyer for employment law runs Google Ads with the slogan "We will win your case". A criminal defense attorney advertises on flyers with "Germany's best criminal defense lawyer". A law firm publishes client reviews on its website – without the clients' requested consent. All three fall under one of the most common mistakes in lawyer marketing: They violate professional advertising obligations without knowing it.
The basic rule according toBRAO § 43bstates: Lawyer advertising is fundamentally permitted – as long as it is factual and professionally related, is not directed at obtaining a specific mandate in an individual case, and does not advertise with inappropriate or misleading information. What this means in practice, what lies in the gray area, and what is definitively prohibited is explained in this guide.
Overview of the legal foundations
Lawyer advertising in Germany is regulated by two sources:
BRAO § 43b (Federal Lawyers' Act)
The central paragraph. It permits advertising provided it is "factual and professionally related". Specifically, this means: no sensational or promotional statements, no advertising aimed at obtaining a specific mandate in a specific matter (that would be impermissible solicitation). Anything that goes beyond general service presentation requires a substantiated basis.
BORA § 6 (Professional Code for Lawyers)
Specifies BRAO § 43b in detail. Among other things, it stipulates that comparative advertising is only permissible under strict conditions and that advertising must not impair the reputation of the legal profession. § 6 para. 1 BORA specifies: Advertising must not be directed at obtaining individual mandates by approaching persons who are in a specific legal case (so-called ambulance chasing).
Note:The specific interpretation of these provisions has evolved through BGH case law. In particular, BGH NJW 2001, 2087 and NJW 2013, 2522 have significantly liberalized the boundaries of permissible lawyer advertising. Much of what earlier bar associations prohibited is now expressly permitted.
What is permitted? 10 specific measures
These measures are expressly permissible under BRAO § 43b and BORA § 6:
- Professional website with service presentation
Law firm website, description of legal areas, qualifications and specializations are permitted without restriction. Reference to specialist lawyer titles is also permissible, provided the title has actually been awarded. - Google Business Profile and business directories
Maintaining and optimizing the Google Business Profile is permitted. Likewise, entries in lawyer directories such as anwalt.de or rechtsanwalt.com. - Google Ads and Facebook Ads
Paid search ads are permissible as long as the ad text is factual and contains no guarantees of success or misleading statements. - Content marketing and blog
Legal articles, guides, FAQs and explanatory content are among the most effective and least risky forms of advertising for lawyers. - Reviews and testimonials
Client reviews on Google, websites or directories are permitted. Prerequisite: the review is voluntary and authentic. Fake or purchased reviews are problematic both under professional law and competition law. - Social media
LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook are permitted. Content-wise, the same rules apply as for other advertising media: factual, not misleading. - Newsletter and email marketing
Email marketing to existing clients and persons who have expressly consented (double opt-in) is permitted without restriction. - Presentations, webinars and press contributions
Expert contributions in trade media, guest lectures and webinars are not only permitted, but particularly recommended for building reputation. - Success figures and statistics
"Over 300 successfully concluded proceedings" or "Success rate of 78% in employment law matters" are permitted if the figures are documented and correctly calculated. - Specialist lawyer title in advertising
Using the specialist lawyer title in advertising is not only permitted, but also strategically valuable from an SEO perspective.
Your law firm advertises – but does it advertise correctly?
In a free 45-minute consultation, we analyze your existing advertising measures and show where optimization potential exists – legally compliant and effective.
Book free initial consultation
What is prohibited? 8 typical violations
These measures violate BRAO §43b, BORA §6 or the UWG:
- Guarantees of success
"We will win your case" or "Guaranteed success" are inadmissible. A guarantee of success is factually incorrect (no lawyer can guarantee court rulings) and misleading according to BRAO §43b. Even indirectly guaranteeing formulations such as "Your rights – guaranteed" are risky. - Superlatives without evidence
"Germany's best criminal defense lawyer", "The No. 1 for employment law" or "Superior legal competence" are inadmissible if no objectively verifiable evidence exists. Award-winning rankings (e.g. FOCUS lawyer lists) may, however, be cited. - Comparative advertising against specific competitors
"We are better than law firm X" or direct solicitation of clients from a specifically named competitor is inadmissible according to BORA §6. General comparisons with one's own positioning ("Unlike large law firms, we offer personal service") are generally permitted. - Cold calling in known legal disputes (ambulance chasing)
The classic example: Someone has a traffic accident – and shortly afterwards receives unsolicited mail from a law firm. This is explicitly prohibited under BORA § 6 para. 1. The same applies to unsolicited telephone contact. - Misleading information about specializations
Anyone who does not hold a specialist lawyer title may not refer to themselves as a "specialist" or "Fachanwalt". Even paraphrases such as "specialized in employment law" can be problematic if no corresponding verifiable qualification exists. - Client data in advertising without consent
Citing clients (even anonymously, if identification is possible) without explicit written consent violates attorney-client privilege and the GDPR. - Unsolicited mass email distribution
Newsletters and law firm information may only be sent to individuals who have actively consented (double opt-in). Cold acquisition via email is also inadmissible under competition law pursuant to UWG §7 para. 2. - Advertising that degrades the profession
Sensationalist or lurid representations that damage the reputation of the legal profession are prohibited under BORA §6 para. 1. This applies to both visual language and tone.
The gray area: What is legally disputed
Not everything is clearly black or white. These areas regularly lead to inquiries and should be handled with care:
Review platforms and selective highlighting of reviews
Prominently displaying positive reviews and not mentioning negative ones is generally permitted – as long as no reviews are deleted or manipulated. The gray area begins when only handpicked statements are actively presented that create a distorted picture.
"Free initial consultation" as an advertising tool
Generally permitted, but: If the free consultation is designed to acquire specific mandates without actually providing advice, this can be deemed misleading. From a GDPR perspective, the data protection notices must also be correct.
AI-generated content
The use of AI-generated texts is not prohibited per se, but: Content must be factually correct and reviewed by an attorney. Erroneous legal representations in one's own advertising can lead to liability risks and violate the objectivity requirement.
Ranking seals and awards
FOCUS Spezial, JUVE Handbuch, Legal 500 and similar rankings may be used in advertising. It becomes problematic with seals that are awarded for money or have no traceable criteria – here there is a risk of misleading advertising under UWG.
Best practices: How to advertise legally compliant and effectively
- Substantiate every quantitative statement. Success figures, review averages and case statistics must be documented internally and be traceable.
- Obtain written consent from clients before using their statements or cases – even anonymously – in advertising.
- Double opt-in for all newsletters and email communication – no exceptions.
- Formulate specialization statements precisely: "Focus on family law" instead of "specialist" if no specialist attorney title is held.
- Have advertising copy reviewed by the relevant bar association or a colleague specialized in attorney law before first use – especially for new campaigns.
- Keep all advertising materials up to date: Outdated review data, inactive social media profiles or obsolete law firm information can be deemed misleading.
Legally compliant law firm marketing – implemented by specialists
OMmatic develops marketing strategies exclusively for attorneys and law firms – BRAO-compliant, effective and measurable. Speak with us about your law firm.
Book a free initial consultation
Frequently Asked Questions
Am I allowed to mention my success rate in advertising?
Yes – if the figure is correctly calculated and verifiable.A statement such as "78% of our employment law mandates result in a favorable solution for the client" is permitted under BRAO §43b, provided the calculation is transparent and comprehensible. Not permitted: "We always win" or unsubstantiated percentages.
Are client reviews allowed on the law firm website?
Yes – with written consent from the client.Testimonials and reviews are generally permissible. Consent should be documented. Complete anonymization (no name, no legal area, no identifying details) is recommended if there is no explicit consent for naming individuals.
Am I allowed to mention other law firms in my advertising?
Generally no – direct disparagement is prohibited.Comparative advertising that denigrates specific competitors is inadmissible under BORA §6 and UWG. General positioning statements that differentiate from a category of law firms (e.g., "personal service instead of anonymous large firm") are permitted, however, as long as no specific names are mentioned.
Can I refer to myself as a "specialist" without a specialist lawyer title?
No – the designation "specialist" is problematic without a specialist lawyer title.According to BGH case law (including BGH NJW 2013, 2522), the designation "specialist" without appropriate qualification is misleading. Permissible, however, is "focus" or "many years of experience in the field of...", provided the statement is factually accurate.
Are Google Ads permitted for lawyers?
Yes – Google Ads are expressly permitted for law firms.Search ads fall under the generally permitted advertising according to BRAO §43b. Note: Ad texts must be factual, contain no guarantees of success, and correctly reproduce the law firm designation. Irreversible keyword occupation (e.g., a competitor's name as a keyword) may be problematic under competition law.
May a law firm advertise a free initial consultation?
Yes – advertising a free initial consultation is permitted.The prerequisite is that the consultation actually takes place and is substantively serious. Purely "initial meetings" that serve exclusively to acquire mandates without genuine advisory services may be classified as misleading. The website's privacy policy must be GDPR-compliant.
Conclusion
Since liberalization through BGH case law, lawyer advertising is considerably broader than many lawyers assume. Most modern marketing measures – from Google Ads to content marketing to social media – are expressly permitted under BRAO §43b and BORA §6. The boundaries lie where advertising misleads, seeks to solicit specific mandates in individual cases, or denigrates the profession.
In practice: Those who know the basic rules have considerably more scope than they probably assume. And those who systematically utilize this scope provide their law firm with a measurable competitive advantage.
Law firm marketing that works – and is legally compliant
OMmatic specializes in marketing strategies for lawyers. We know the boundaries – and know how to achieve maximum visibility within these boundaries.
